Part Three: Context of Assaults on Humanity

Part One of this series listed several modes of assault on humanity: unleashing of bioweapons, weather warfare, thought control, attacks on the supply chain with a focus on food production. Part Two was a window into child sex slavery, ritualized rape and murder of infants that seems unthinkable even to those of us who are inured to a world dominated by greedy corporations and power-hungry politicians. Here in Part Three, I start with a broad background of human history, which has been so widely misrepresented in our schooling and in academic anthropology, and claim that the 21st century is a turning point comparable to Noah’s flood, a time of upheaval and transformation. From there, I present several radically different frameworks for understanding the assaults on humanity against the background of transformative change.

---

A time of crisis for the planet, no matter how you slice it

It’s not as if everything would be hunky dory if only these evil beings would stop attacking us. This is a time in history when multiple crises are converging and coming to a head, each complicating the other and constraining the wiggle room for avoiding disaster. I hasten to add that the impending collapse of the global political and economic power structures will be an opportunity to create a million local communities, diverse in our beliefs and our ways of relating, stewards of nature rather than arrogant masters, coexisting without conflict on a shared planet.

Some of the crises that will certainly disrupt our familiar ways of living and working in the next few years:

1. Ecosystems are collapsing because humans have treated animals and plants as if they were inexhaustible “resources” rather than interdependent ecosystem agents.

2. Economic systems are collapsing because they are built on debt-based money, and the world’s interest payments are now on a scale comparable to the world’s productive output. So much wealth in so few hands is an unstable situation.

3. Intelligent machines are replacing humans in all spheres of human productivity. Machines have different strengths and different weaknesses. Generally, they are less likely to fail, but they have no common sense to fall back on. When they fail they fail, the failures are whoppers. 

4. Global dominance by the USA is being challenged by an emerging coalition with far more productive capacity than the USA, but less military power, less freedom and less creative innovation. This is BRICS+. 

5. Reductionist science, which has been the predominant secular religion of much of the world, is coming to face challenges which will require a new, holistic science, 

   1. possibly one in which life is a fundamental force and consciousness is part of physics;

   2. certainly, the idea of mechanistic predictability will fall with the acknowledgment of anomalies, exceptions, miracles and what Dean Radin calls Real Magic.

6. UFOs are breaking into the MSM and must be absorbed into our view of who we are and where we came from. (I don’t take a position on what UFOs are. This subject has been the target of the most extensive disinformation campaign in the world. The truth is likely to be stranger than our most imaginative science fiction — whether or not the phenomenon is about extraterrestrial visitors.)

7. Transformative technologies have been developed in secret, and when they inevitably leak into the public domain, there will be potential for both utopian abundance and apocalyptic destruction. (UFOs may be the source of these technologies, or the technologies may have been developed by humans, and UFOs would then be displays of thoroughly human technology.

8. The biggest crisis of all is that CARBON DIOXIDE IS INCREASING FROM 0.03% TO 0.04% OF OUR ATMOSPHERE. (JK)

Yes, in my opinion we can scratch the most storied #8 off our list. But any one of the other seven could make for unpredictable and chaotic events in the near future, even if there were no global cabal conducting a many-pronged attack on humanity.

Ancient technological civilizations

It may help to put these crises into perspective if we acknowledge that technological civilizations have existed on this planet in the past. The most recent advanced, global civilization was destroyed by an astronomical event, probably an impact, that ended the last ice age 12,700 years ago. 

I became convinced of this reality by the books of Graham Hancock and the videos of Ben (UnchartedX) van Kerkwyck [one, two]. I also summarized the subject two years ago, so I will be very brief here. 

• The Pyramids are a proof in themselves. How do you quarry and transport and lift and set in place blocks of hard granite up to 80 tons in weight without machines? How do you get 3 million stones, each a different dimension, to fit precisely together and create a structure aligned to true north with accuracy less than a tenth of a degree without computers?

• The largest cut stones are not in the Pyramids but in Baalbek, Lebanon, over a thousand tons, much larger than today’s largest cranes could lift.

• In Saqqara, Egypt, there are drill holes in hard granite, where you can measure the pitch of the drill from scars on the inside surface, and they are cutting further with each turn of the bit than today’s high-speed diamond drills could manage.

• In the Cairo Museum, there are 40,000 vessels, like pitchers or urns, not made of clay, but carved each from a single piece of solid stone. The proportions are symmetric to within a thousandth of an inch, which would certainly require precise machine tooling. However, no machine in existence today could carve out the inside of such a vessel without cracking the very hard, very brittle stone.

The argument is not that the Dynastic Egyptians had these technologies, but that they inherited these monuments from a lost civilization that was thousands of years older than theirs. Many ancient texts and oral traditions around the world attest to a time of universal destruction, of which “Noah’s flood” is the most familiar to Westerners. If a globally-connected civilization tends to congeal in population centers with ocean harbors, then it is understandable that when sea levels rose by 100 meters, great numbers of people lost their lives, and the survivors lost the global supply chains on which their consumption depended. A world built on technology was thrown back into the stone age, to begin anew. The only memories of the apocalypse that survived took the form of myths and oral traditions.

If civilization the world over is devastated in a coming apocalypse, it is very probably not the first time. The cataclysms of the Younger Dryas period provide a geologic explanation for the collapse of a global civilization; but in various traditions of our mythic past, the collapse is attributed to decadence and loss of moral compass.

“And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.” — Genesis, from the King James Bible

“[The Atlanteans] then, being unable to bear their fortune, behaved unseemly, and to him who had an eye to see grew visibly debased, for they were losing the fairest of their precious gifts; but to those who had no eye to see the true happiness, they appeared glorious and blessed at the very time when they were full of avarice and unrighteous power. Zeus…perceiving that an honourable race was in a woeful plight, contrived to inflict punishment on them, that they might be chastened and improve.” — Plato, Critias

So, what’s going on? Two popular narratives that I don’t think explain much

1. They’re out to enslave us
   
   For most of human history, people needed servants if they wanted to live in comfort and leisure. If they wanted to live in a palace, entertain lavishly, and eat gourmet meals every night, they needed an army of servants.

But in the 20th century, most of that labor was automated and now the need for personal butlers and household slaves is minimal. Megalomaniacs may have a need to have many people obeying their commands, but this is a psychological need, not directly related to wielding physical power. 

2. It’s a population reduction agenda.
   
   There’s no shortage of globalists, pseudo-environmentalists, and eugenicists talking about population control. But if that is their agenda, they’ve made some colossal mistakes in the last few years. COVID and the COVID shots have killed a mere quarter of one percent of the world’s 8 billion people, and most of those were old or sick. There is a long-term effect of the shots on fertility, but, again it is not enough to make a dent in the world’s population. They’ve blown their cover, and the cat is out of the bag before they got their program off the ground.

If you’re trying to kill off most of the world’s people, you have to be sure you spare your family and friends. A bioweapon is too blunt an instrument for this purpose.

Clearly, the people who brought us COVID-19 were willing to cause deaths on a massive scale, but I doubt that this was their primary purpose.

So, what’s going on? Why it’s so difficult to know.

Yesterday morning, I was listening to Eric Weinstein. [What follows is not an exact quote. I have condensed and paraphrased, but I believe I have captured his intention faithfully, filling in a few gaps].

“You cannot trust Harvard or Nature or Office of Management and Budget or the World Health Organization or Bureau of Labor Statistics or The Lancet. You cannot trust any newspaper that I’m aware of or any scientific journal. All those institutions are out of control, and those who still have eyes in their heads can see it. Once somebody has spat in my face and tried to convince me it's raining, I'm no longer going to listen to anything Tony Fauci says, even if he knows a lot more about virology than I do...People feel, I don’t know which end is up, I don’t know who’s telling me the truth. I can spot these lies, they’re so transparent, and they’re everywhere.

“At the same time, you cannot have a world without institutions. We’re not built for it. There’s no part of you that’s prepared to generate all your own electricity, purify your water, hunt in the park for your food. You need an army. You need a police department. You need other humans in your life whom you can rely on. You can only play “wild west” for a weekend before you realize that you’re in over your head, that rugged self-reliance is a pipe dream.

“We need our institutions, but they have become filled with people who lie for a living, because that’s what leads to success and advancement in the system that we have built. Sociopaths have the clearest path to success, and they’re now embedded in all the institutions that we need to be able to rely on.

“Some people say, we see that the institutions are irredeemably corrupt. Let’s trash them and start over. Others say, we need these institutions, so we need to look past the fact that they’re obviously lying about nearly everything of any importance. Neither of these is a viable path forward. We can’t vote these people out because the vote count and the newspapers that report on it are part of the problem.

“We’re out in the open ocean. We’re bobbing in the waves, and we don’t know what direction to swim because land is nowhere in sight. We have a sense that we’re not going to be able to tread water much longer.” 

In a segue that only a mind like Weinstein’s could follow, he leaps from there to, “All this comes from failure to love our children. People who love their children don’t drill holes in their children’s liferaft.”

So, what’s going on? Frameworks in which we might seek answers.

There can be no excuse for unleashing rampant destruction on the globe and on human institutions, but we might seek to understand how the perps think, what is motivating them, so as to anticipate their future attacks and cut them off at the pass.

1—They’re accelerating an inevitable collapse for reasons they see as humanitarian.

I wrote about this two years ago. Quoting myself,

There is a small, elite group of billionaires, working in secret over the last decades, maybe centuries. I don’t know who they are, but there are some good candidates. Catherine Austin Fitts calls them “Mr. Global”, so I will, too. … They have perceived, correctly, that if human civilization is to collapse, the sooner it happens, the less damage there will be from which to recover.

Maybe the Powers that Shouldn’t Be see civilizational collapse as inevitable because of the polycrisis that I describe above. Maybe all the assaults on humanity are intended to bring our cultures and the world economy crashing down, because if the crash occurs now rather than twenty or forty years from now, it will be a lesser apocalypse, fewer deaths, less suffering. 

This is the most charitable face I can put on the monster.. 

2—They’re trying to get the world locked down and surveilled before the inevitable leakage of technologies that will give every Ted Kaczynski the capacity to build superbombs

Many lines of evidence lead to the suspicion that there are people on our planet who have access to technologies far ahead of what is in the public domain. Jason Jorjani describes in detail a breakaway civilization built on an alternative physics in the 19th century, and describes farmers who reported hypersonic airplanes landing on their fields already in the 1890s. I have reported on cold fusion as a suppressed technology, to prevent disclosure of which people have been bribed or murdered. Here is a paragraph suggestive of technologies that were already available to the US military in the 1940s:

Large undersea installations with a shirt-sleeve environment have existed under the continental shelves for many decades. The technology now exists, using off-the-shelf petroleum, mining, submarine, and nuclear equipment, to establish permanent manned installations within the sea floor that do not have any air umbilical or other connection with the land or water surface, yet maintain a normal one-atmosphere environment within. This presentation briefly reviews the past and present in-the-sea-floor mineral industry. The methods presently practical for direct access to and from permanent in-the-sea-floor- installations are outlined and the specific operations and types of tools indicated. Initial power requirements and cost estimates are included.

From Manned undersea structures—the rock-site concept, military white paper, 1966.

Any technology this powerful would be extremely dangerous if weaponized. Perhaps the globalists have these uber-powerful technologies, and have been desperately plugging leaks to see that they don’t get re-discovered on the outside or revealed from the inside by a whistle-blower. They fear instructions on the internet for creating a world-destroying bomb in your basement, requiring just a few hundred dollars’ of materials and a high school knowledge of science. 

Seeing that they can’t keep their secrets much longer, they are desperate to get the entire world under their control, locked down and surveilled 24/7 before the cat gets out of the bag. 

3—This is the latter-day edition of a battle between Enki and Enlil, or, if you prefer, Prometheus and Zeus.

There are origin myths in several ancient cultures that tell the story of gods who cross-bred with hominids to create the human race. There ensued a conflict between two gods (or Titans or Anunnaki or ETs). One wanted to keep the new race subservient, while the other wanted to give to humankind the power of the gods. In all these stories the former, the slavemaster prevailed but not so completely as to prevent humanity from attaining some taste of god-like power. 

These ancient texts can be read as describing visitation from an advanced extraterrestrial race with technologies that our ancestors could only regard as god-like. Miracles in the Bible and its precursors were technologies beyond the understanding of people at the time. In the words of Arthur C. Clarke, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”

It is possible to see in the conflicts today a continuation of this epic struggle between mankind’s liberator and mankind’s oppressor. Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab behave the way they do because they are working in service to Enlil. In Babylonian mythology, it was Enlil who inflicted the great flood on our world, and he continues to this day to do what is necessary to prevent humans from rising above our station, (as he perceives it).

You and I are in service to Enki…

or Prometheus… 

or Satan?

4—This is a contest between God and Satan.

In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the closest parallel we have to Enlil and Enki is in the Garden of Eden. It is the Lord God who wants to keep his people ignorant, naked, and simple, to limit their lifespans to three score and ten, to confine them and bind them to obey strict rules. It is Satan who offers Eve fruit from the Tree of Knowledge, and God quickly intervenes to whisk his children out of the Garden before they can taste the Tree of Life. 

It is not difficult to make the Old Testament God out to be a ruthless, domineering son-of-a-bitch. He wipes out entire cities for the sin of bowing to a different god. He demands a show of loyalty from Abraham in a willingness to burn his own son. He instructs Joshua to kill every man, woman, and child in the city of Jericho, to slaughter and burn the animals, and to collect all the precious metals to be deposited in the House of the Lord. I could go on…

Can we blame Satan for offering Eve a path of liberation from such brutality? 

Worship of Satan in today’s world takes many forms. Since the 1980s, Goth musicians have flaunted symbols of evil. The Church of Satan, founded in 1966 by Anton LaVey, seems to be more about theatrics than doing actual evil. Half a century earlier, Aleister Crowley led a movement that identified with Lucifer and flirted more seriously with real evil. “Do what thou wilt shall be the only law.” This could have been the inspiration for the Cremation of Care ritual at Bohemian Grove in California. 

It is a further step to imagine there are people who seek complete the liberation offered by the Serpent in the Garden by raping children, burning forests, and unleashing pandemics on the world. It is more than confusing that in the framing #3, you and I are the Prometheans, casting off shackles that enslave us to power-hungry billionaires or spirits or extraterrestrials; but in framing #4, it is the Globalists who seek to expand their own powers in defiance of a jealous God.

Devout Christians are the lifeblood of the medical freedom movement. My Christian friends have no trouble understanding what is happening in the world as the Devil’s handiwork. 

In my personal belief system, there is no Satan, just people who believe in him and perhaps derive some real parapsychological powers from their rituals. There are secret societies that preserve a tradition of breaking the minds of young humans with torture so that they will continue a multi-generation project of wreaking global havoc, creating suffering for the sheer pleasure of creating suffering. I side with the Christians in characterizing these acts as the essence of evil.

5—Existential Psychology

Nietzsche famously declared that “God is dead”, and proceeded to outline an ethos for humans based on a call to power. Rollo May was no Nietzschian, but he diagnosed the disease of Western man in the 20th century in terms of what was lost when 19th century science turned our world into a machine devoid of meaning and wonder. “Science” claimed that physical laws could trace every event in nature to an antecedent cause. No room remained for God, and all notions of value, of good and evil, of beauty and transcendence seemed to be human vanity, an unnecessary appendage to the mechanistic description of reality.

May was following Max Weber, Emil Durkheim, Martin Heidegger, and Leo Strauss in tracing the social dissolution and violence of the 20th Century to the elevation of science to a religion. May elaborates that corporatization of work deprived workers of their sense of individual value, and a new mobility tore apart families and communities. 

There is a connection between the mystical and the daemonic. May describes a deep, driving passion within each individual, the creative force that comes out as procreation and science and art. Our creative force is inseparable from the daemonic spirit. If we try to tame our creativity and bring it under control of reason, we lose the baby with the bathwater. 

“Wenn meine Teufel mich verlassen, fürchte ich, dass auch meine Engel die Flucht ergreifen werden.”
“If my devils are to leave me, I am afraid my angels will take flight as well”.
― Rainer Maria Rilke 

When deprived of grounding in a shared system of morality, people are more likely to pursue money and power without thought of what they want to do with these potentia. Megalomania is the irrational pursuit of power to the exclusion of other values. Every American President, and indeed almost every world leader may be a megalomaniac. Playing by today’s rulebook, is it possible to fight your way to the top of the heap without behaving like a sociopath?

6—Moral frameworks that transcend good and evil

My friend Dr Madhava Setty has just posted a long Substack, relating the Law of One to ancient Tantric texts. What these perspectives have in common is that they reject the dialectic of good and evil. All the world is God playing hide-and-seek, taking on different guises to create the greatest story ever told. “Who is the victim and who is the perpetrator if they are the same?”  

“Through immersion into awakened awareness, there is no more relationship with virtue or sin” — Vatulanatha sutra #12, as translated by Christopher Wallis

We are all souls on a journey of many lifetimes, trying out different roles, developing wisdom over the course of aeons. If we embrace the reality of reincarnation, then murder has the effect of accelerating the victim on his karmic journey. How does this affect our judgment about evil and innocence?

From the Thien Buddhist tradition…

I am the child in Uganda, all skin and bones,
my legs as thin as bamboo sticks.
And I am the arms merchant,
selling deadly weapons to Uganda.

I am the twelve-year-old girl,
refugee on a small boat,
who throws herself into the ocean
after being raped by a sea pirate.

And I am also the pirate,
my heart not yet capable
of seeing and loving.

— Thich Nhat Hanh

The irony is that people who subscribe to this view—that there is no such thing as good or evil—generally live in accordance with high standards of morality. Thich was a hero in his youth, a saint in later years.

Personally, I am drawn to the perspective that we are on a journey of souls, and that we learn from playing different roles in a cosmic drama. But in this lifetime, I have no doubt which side I am on, what role I am here to play. Sometimes I can feel gratitude for Dr Fauci’s willingness to wear the black hat in this horse opera so that I can wear the white hat.

7—Jason Jorjani

Jorjani is the only person I know who has attempted a coherent synthesis of all the anomalous phenomena, all the events and stories that don’t fit into consensus reality, including some (not all) of the assaults on humanity that I listed in Part One. His story is at once too intricate to relate here, too fantastical to wrap our heads around, and probably too conventional to be correct. 

“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.”
— Niels Bohr to Wolfgang Pauli

If anything, Jorjani casts too wide a net in his project of explicating human destiny. His narrative draws on Skinwalker Ranch, the Biblical Apocrypha, and the Akashic Record. 

Any summary of Jorjani’s ideas cannot do it justice, so I refer you to Closer Encounters and from there to a dozen other books Jorjani has authored in his young life. He frames his story in terms of Prometheus, who wanted to give man the power of the gods and Zeus who punished Prometheus with a fate worse than death. The power to travel in time, to change history, to move mountains with our thoughts, is partly technological and partly psychical. Mankind is on the threshold of this power and it is our challenge to demonstrate that we are worthy of using it for high and noble ends, without weaponizing it to destroy each other before the experiment gets off the ground. Jorjani is an elitist who finds the great majority of mankind unworthy of apotheosis. Our imaginations are not wide enough, nor do we have the temperament to venture into the unknown as long as a path of safety remains open.

[Jorjani would say “their imaginations…nor do they have”, but I have substituted “we” because I’m a democrat, a species for which Jorjani expresses intellectual contempt. While we’re on the subject, I should warn you that Jorjani’s morality is not my morality, but is perhaps close to Nietzsche’s. Life is not sacred, nor human life inviolable. His highest good is the expansion, for some segment of humanity, of our knowledge and our power and our creativity. The rest of humanity can adapt or die, and he suspects that most of us are incapable of adapting.]

Jorjani’s God is the Trickster who gives us both alien abductions and crop circles, horrific wars and transcendent miracles to baffle and challenge us. The Trickster would happily enslave us, but we have the power to engage with the Trickster on a different level, to redefine the game, staking the future of our planet on a venture that is satisfied with nothing less than mankind’s infinite potential. 

Groping toward a path forward

Life is stranger than any of us expected
There is a solemn, imponderable fate
Enigma rules, and the heart has no certainty.
— Richard Eberhart

I don’t imagine that any of these seven perspectives offers a framework from which we can confidently parse the events with which we are confronted in each day’s news. But I am optimistic that we collectively can accomplish sufficient sense-making to guide our way forward. If we quiet our senses and reach to a source within, each of us is given enough intuitive knowledge of the situation to guide our activism from day to day. In order to create a deeper understanding, we need to share ideas, to understand perspectives that are foreign to us and collectively to synthesize a fuller picture of reality. 

The world’s greatest independent thinkers are not presently engaged with the world’s greatest problems. They have great expertise, each in their own area of specialty, and they are accustomed to taking the podium and explaining what they know. They are not necessarily good at listening, absorbing perspectives very different from their own, abandoning or at least contextualizing the ideas for which they have become justly renowned.

To further understanding of the multipronged assault on humanity, bringing together a convention of broad thinkers who also have the capacity to listen and assimilate new ideas is my next project.

The polycrisis through which we are all living affords to those of us who recognize the transformation and our role in it an incomparable opportunity to engage the full spectrum of our faculties in service to our deeply held values. From this engagement, from the fear and the challenge and the collective action, grows an appreciation of everything that we are fighting for — the diversity of human expression, the beauty of nature, the freedom to think and to create.