53 Comments
Feb 5·edited Feb 5Liked by Josh Mitteldorf

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I had never heard of this man. His story, however is corroborated by several other "whistleblowers" who subsequently faced defamatory attacks. I am referring to Corey Goode and Emery Smith, both who claim they have worked in DUMBs and have alluded to advanced technologies used to do underground mining at this scale.

Interestingly it was Emery Smith, I think, who claimed that people worked in these underground facilities with dizzying technologies did so for weeks at a time. When they went back to visit their families, specific memories of what they saw and did were wiped clean. This is how these kinds of secrets could be kept for decades. Even if they did blab, who would believe them?

Their stories were brought to attention by David Wilcock, another character whose credibility has waned over the years.

Nevertheless, we are left with the reality that tens of trillions of dollars have been budgeted and further vast sums are unaccounted for. Yet we are asked to accept that this kind of money all went to making large boats, fancy planes and sophisticated drones. Let us not forget that fusion bombs were built before we had transistor radios. If there were other super advanced products, where are they if not hidden someplace? Deep underground perhaps?

I agree with @Christopher in that if ET is here and they are not benevolent, they would have little trouble having our way with us.

Phil Schneider was brave to come forward. I personally believe that he is telling what he believes is the truth. Framing these projects as a necessary precaution against malevolent species is the best way to mobilize a large number of people to dig very large holes in the Earth's crust.

Expand full comment

Josh, you are one of a kind anazing in your presentations. I thank you for succinctly sharing this sweeping scenario for our contemplation & speculation. I would not be surprised if some or even much of this is true.

Expand full comment

This part, in particular, is absurd:

"In 1954, Eisenhower signed a treaty with ETs, granting us their technology in exchange for permission to abduct humans and animals. The ETs were even less honest about keeping to the terms than the humans."

Why would beings with vastly superior technology (presumably if they made it to earth they'd have either mastered faster than light travel, or interdimensional) have to enter into an agreement?

They'd simply do what they wanted. It'd be like a bunch of cavemen armed with spears trying to face down a modern military.

Expand full comment

I've got some great bridges for sale: Brooklyn, London. Excellent credit terms for accredited buyters.

Expand full comment
Feb 6·edited Feb 6

Gotta say I've never understood the fascination with painting the obviously bumbling retards we have in charge as secret supergeniuses with advanced technology. Is it a refusal to believe that we're ruled by people this stupid, this unimaginative? Maybe their apparent idiocy is just a cover for something far more sinister?

But hypothetically if there were a bunch of underground bases, and there's people out there who built them and know where they are, it'd be a real shame if some landslides accidentally covered the entrances after our room temperature IQ masters of the universe retreated into them. Just tragic. Likewise the more prosaic doomsday bunkers they actually do build here and there.

Expand full comment

Thanks Josh. I've watched the first 10 minutes, will take it in installments, and I appreciate you bullet-point list. The 1909 Truth Or Consequences story is interesting, and the 1954 "treaty"...

Expand full comment